Growing up in the seventies, I recall those special occasions when a new 3D movie would come out in theaters. It was typically in the form of a bad horror movie but there was something fun about putting on those silly glasses, sitting and watching in wonder. Those days of wearing those silly glasses could soon be over. A recent study (Kim, et al., 2012) suggests that using a frontal projection-type
auto-stereoscopic display together with a polarizer and a quarter-wave
retarding film can bring 3D viewing without using 3D glasses. This is tone of the first studies that looks at the differences between frontal projection-type auto-stereoscopic displays and integral imaging by using a projector. The researchers propose the use of a three-dimensional (3D) displays as vital for a stereoscopic display and an auto-stereoscopic display, such as in the parallax barrier method, the lenticular lens method, and the integral imaging method.
Yes, it could be possible that wearing those silly 3D glasses could soon be coming to an end.
Two Forces:
Economical - The use of 3D in the home is still in its early stages as the everyday consumer has yet to buy-in to the value and cost benefit. Clear advancement in the technology has resulted in recent blockbuster hits as Avatar which showcases 3D technical capabilities.
Global - The use of 3D technology at home and in community movie theaters is primarily used in the western culture and limited in eastern cultures due to cost.
Evan
Reference:
Youngmin Kim, Keehoon Hong, Jiwoon Yeom, Jisoo Hong, Jae-Hyun Jung, Yong Wook Lee, Jae-Hyeung Park, and Byoungho Lee A frontal projection-type three-dimensional display
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-20-18-20130&id=240807
No comments:
Post a Comment